Library
Writing the Uncanny · 20 of 23
Writing the Uncanny
literature HIGH

Repressed History and the House

Writing the Uncanny Dan Coxon and Richard V. Hirst (eds.)
repression history architecture ghost feminist colonial time

Key Principle

The house is not merely a setting — it is an epistemological structure. Its rooms encode what is permitted to know; its locked doors and forbidden staircases give physical form to the limits of acknowledged knowledge. The Freudian mechanism of the return of the repressed operates at every scale: the personal (the family secret), the political (feminist and colonial histories suppressed by official record), and the architectural (the forbidden room whose prohibition generates the compulsion to imagine what it holds). In each case, the uncanny is produced not by importing external strangeness but by revealing that the familiar space was always the site of concealment.

Why This Matters

The home as uncanny architecture is the direct embodiment of the heimlich/ unheimlich paradox: it is the place of safety that was always also the place of concealment. Roberts extends this into political and historiographical territory: official histories that have suppressed the experiences of women, colonised peoples, and the working class constitute a collective body of unacknowledged material. When that material returns in fiction, the effect is uncanny precisely because it was never absent — it was present but hidden. The reader recognises it as something that was always there.

The ghost, properly understood, is the formal expression of this: not a supernatural entity but a narrative remainder — what is left behind when a story is suppressed or left unfinished. This means ghosts are generative. "A ghost comes from the land of the dead but refers to something as yet unborn: a new story." The writer's task is not to stage a haunting but to understand the story the ghost cannot tell, and to tell it. You lay a ghost by understanding its story.

Good Examples

Michèle Roberts, The Walworth Beauty — collapsed time: Two historical layers exist simultaneously and each breaks through the surface of the other. Joseph (nineteenth century) sees Madeleine (twenty-first century) pass. Madeleine looks in a mirror and sees Mrs Dulcimer (nineteenth century) reflected. Neither layer is primary; neither is safely past. The uncanny is ontological, not atmospheric: the reader cannot position themselves safely in the "present" of the narrative. (Section 9)

Shirley Jackson, The Haunting of Hill House — the familiarly unmotherly: Luke describes the house: "Everything so padded. Great embracing chairs and sofas which turn out to be hard and unwelcome when you sit down, and reject you at once." The house promises home and delivers its opposite. Eleanor responds: "I am home, I am home, she thought" — which is not irony but the uncanny's most dangerous logic. The most threatening place is experienced as home because home has always felt dangerous. Jackson's biographical wound — a mother's conditional love — is not represented but displaced onto the architecture, becoming the formal logic of the space. (Chapter: Spotlight on Shirley Jackson)

Roberts on feminist historiography as raw material: "A woman's existence was only noted by her contemporaries if she broke the law." The records that survive are already told in a language a court could cope with, not the whole truth. The gap between official record and lived experience — what was suppressed, what was only preserved because a woman offended — is the writer's material. Fiction that ignores these repressions produces "caricatures rather than characters." (Section 9)

Counterpoints

Chronological narrative implying the past is over: Conventional historical fiction that organises its material as a completed sequence — what happened then, what happened next — reassures the reader that the past is finished. This is structurally antithetical to the uncanny, which depends on the past being present. Roberts's formal innovation is insistence that it is not over: two layers exist simultaneously, "one constantly breaking through the surface of the other. This was reciprocal." (Section 9)

Research as background colour: Writers who use historical research only as atmospheric texture — period detail, costume, speech — miss its function as uncanny source material. The content of what official record kept and what it omitted is not decoration but the generator of negative spaces in the fiction. The gap is the material. (Section 9)

The redeemed ghost: If the ghost is explained, its story resolved and its grievance addressed, the uncanny collapses into comfort. Roberts's formulation depends on the ghost remaining generative, not terminal. Ward's convergent argument is that ghosts represent temporal stasis — what fails to move when it should. Resolution returns movement and ends the uncanny. (Section 9; cf. Section 26, Ward, cited in distilled-chunk-002)

Key Quotes

"British history becomes a house haunted by what it has tried to forget." — Michèle Roberts, Section 9

"A ghost is a metaphor. A metaphor says: this is that. A ghost is a dead person and a ghost is alive. A ghost is a pre-linguistic image of repressed language and it is a story wanting to be told." — Michèle Roberts, Section 9

"You lay a ghost by understanding its story." — Michèle Roberts, Section 9

"For a woman constantly criticised by her mother, alienated by her husband, and isolated by her neighbours, the worst answer of all is: 'No one's.'" — Grady Hendrix on The Haunting of Hill House (Chapter: Spotlight on Shirley Jackson)

Rules of Thumb

  • Treat the house as an argument about what can be known. Every locked room, forbidden staircase, and sealed attic is a structural limit — not atmosphere but architecture of permission.
  • Research the official record for what it omitted as well as what it contains. The gaps in the archive are your primary material.
  • Ask what the ghost's unfinished story is before staging the haunting. If you cannot answer that, you have not yet found your uncanny source.
  • Biographical displacement — not representation — is how personal wound becomes structural logic. The writer does not appear in the fiction; the wound's logic organises the space.
  • Collapsed time is not a time-travel device; it is a structural claim that the past is not past. Both temporal layers must be equally present, equally capable of seeing and being seen.

Related References