Library
Building Imaginary Worlds: The Theory and History of Subcreation · 3 of 11
Building Imaginary Worlds: The Theory and History of Subcreation
Fiction Writing CRITICAL

Subcreation: The Theory of Imaginary Worlds

Building Imaginary Worlds: The Theory and History of Subcreation Mark J. P. Wolf
subcreation secondary-world invention completeness consistency world-gestalten secondariness

Key Principle

Imaginary worlds are ontologically prior to stories and deserve treatment as autonomous entities, not narrative backdrops. The theoretical foundation is the Coleridge-MacDonald-Tolkien lineage of subcreation:

  1. Coleridge established imagination as active and creative, not passive recombination. Primary Imagination coordinates sensory data into perception; Secondary Imagination consciously "dissolves, diffuses, dissipates, in order to recreate."
  2. MacDonald required that an invented world possess internal laws in harmony with each other: "The moment he forgets one of them, he makes the story, by its own postulates, incredible" (Chapter 1). Physical laws may be freely invented; moral laws must be preserved.
  3. Tolkien synthesized both into subcreation -- "creating under" -- using pre-existing concepts from God's creation in new combinations. The mechanism is linguistic: "When we can take green from grass, blue from heaven, and red from blood, we have already an enchanter's power" (Chapter 1).

The world is logically prior to the story: "Worlds, unlike stories, need not rely on narrative structures, though stories are always dependent on the worlds in which they take place" (Chapter 1).

Why This Matters

Every predecessor framework -- franchises, supersystems, transmedia storytelling -- moves closer to treating the imaginary world as the primary object of study but remains anchored in some other concern (commerce, narrative, medium). This category error explains why scholarship has systematically missed imaginary worlds as entities in their own right.

The practical consequence is equally significant: if you design only for narrative coherence, you miss the engagement mechanism that sustains long-term audience investment. World-building adds details motivated by the world's internal logic and completeness, regardless of narrative function. What conventional criticism treats as flaws in world-heavy fiction (digressions, exposition, slow pacing) are actually the mechanisms of world-construction.

Three essential properties govern all secondary worlds -- invention, completeness, and consistency -- and they form a mutually constraining system:

  • Invention: The degree to which Primary World defaults have been changed. Requires achieving Tolkien's "inner consistency of reality." Four levels: nominal (names), cultural (customs, institutions), natural (flora, fauna, physics), and ontological (dimensionality, spacetime).
  • Completeness: Enough world-information that unanswerable questions do not destroy the illusion. True completeness is impossible; the goal is an illusion -- questions may be difficult to answer but never impossible.
  • Consistency: No conflicting elements that prevent the world from cohering. "The most restraints for a subcreator, since it involves the interrelationship of the various parts of the world" (Chapter 2).

Greater completeness demands more invention and makes consistency harder. Greater invention multiplies consistency challenges (every changed default cascades). Consistency constrains what invention is possible. Lawlessness does not produce freedom but incoherence.

Secondary worlds exist on a spectrum of secondariness, not a binary. Ranges from autobiography (closest to Primary World) through overlaid worlds (Spider-Man's NYC) to fully detached secondary worlds (Oz, Middle-earth). Blade Runner's 2019 LA "is as much a constructed environment as Oz, yet it depicts a Primary World location" (Chapter 1).

Good Examples

  • Tolkien's "green sun" standard: not merely imagining something strange but making it believable within a coherent world. "To make a Secondary World inside which the green sun will be credible, commanding Secondary Belief, will probably require labour and thought, and will certainly demand a special skill, a kind of elvish craft" (Chapter 1).
  • LeGuin's Always Coming Home describes the Kesh through "a variety of narrators and an assortment of brief stories, fables, poems, artwork, maps, charts, archaeological and anthropological notes" -- no main character, no central storyline. World-building as self-sufficient creative practice (Chapter 1).
  • Heinlein's "the door dilated" -- a single verb substitution implying different architecture, technology, automation, power sources, and an entire civilization. World-building operates through cascading implication, not exhaustive description (Chapter 1).
  • LeGuin's androgynous Gethen comments on sexism; Tolkien's immortal Elves who envy mortal Men enable commentary on death. The subcreator can make the world's very fabric carry meaning -- a philosophical method unavailable to traditional narrative (Chapter 1).

Counterpoints

  • Possible-worlds philosophy (Pavel, Dolezel, Ryan) provides ontological legitimation for fictional worlds but is too abstract and text-centric. It can classify worlds but cannot explain how they are built or experienced across media (Chapter 1).
  • The paradox of freedom: "Each invention and changed default places limitations on further directions the world can develop in, making systems of integrated inventions more difficult, the more completely one has invented a world" (Chapter 2). Every act of subcreation constrains subsequent acts.
  • Inconsistencies become less damaging as they move further from the active narrative. Tatooine's ecological implausibility does not ruin Star Wars because it exists at the infrastructure level, far from the storyline. Fan communities treat inconsistencies as "merely gaps in the data, unexplained phenomena that further research and speculation will sort out" (Chapter 2).

Key Quotes

"Worlds, unlike stories, need not rely on narrative structures, though stories are always dependent on the worlds in which they take place." -- Mark J. P. Wolf, Chapter 1

"He makes a Secondary World which your mind can enter. Inside it, what he relates is 'true': it accords with the laws of that world. You therefore believe it while you are, as it were, inside." -- Mark J. P. Wolf, Chapter 1 (quoting Tolkien)

"His world once invented, the highest law that comes next into play is, that there shall be harmony between the laws by which the new world has begun to exist." -- Mark J. P. Wolf, Chapter 1 (quoting MacDonald)

"Fantasy may be, as I think, not less but more subcreative; but at any rate it is found in practice that 'the inner consistency of reality' is more difficult to produce, the more unlike are the images and the rearrangements of primary material to the actual arrangements of the Primary World." -- Mark J. P. Wolf, Chapter 1 (quoting Tolkien)

Rules of Thumb

  • The world is logically prior to the story. Design the world first; let narrative emerge from its logic.
  • Secondary Belief puts the burden on the subcreator, not the audience. The standard is generative (build something convincing enough to produce active belief), not permissive (hope the audience overlooks flaws).
  • Invention, completeness, and consistency must be balanced simultaneously -- increasing any one raises the difficulty of the others.
  • Secondary worlds inherit Primary World defaults unless explicitly reset. The tension between retention and departure defines every secondary world's character.
  • Subcreation is bounded from below: causality, moral consequence, and emotional realism cannot be eliminated without destroying narrative itself.
  • The cultural and natural levels of invention offer the greatest balance between familiar defaults and new subcreated ones -- deep enough to be distinctive, shallow enough to sustain narrative.

Related References