Library
The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure · 7 of 10
The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure
ARG Design MEDIUM

Routinization of Communitas

The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure Victor Turner
communitas routinization structure Franciscan permanent-liminality scaling

Key Principle

Spontaneous communitas -- the immediate, egalitarian, I-Thou encounter between whole human beings -- inevitably degrades into structure over time. "It is the fate of all spontaneous communitas in history to undergo what most people see as a 'decline and fall' into structure and law." Extending Weber's routinization of charisma, Turner shows that it is not only a leader's charisma that routinizes but the communitas of the entire founding group. -- Victor Turner, Chapter 4.

Turner identifies three modalities that mark this trajectory:

  • Existential/spontaneous communitas -- the direct, fleeting I-Thou encounter.
  • Normative communitas -- what emerges when spontaneous communitas is organized into a perduring social system with rules and controls.
  • Ideological communitas -- utopian models prescribing conditions for communitas.

Only the first is genuinely anti-structural; the latter two are "already within the domain of structure."

Why This Matters

Any group that begins in communitas (a startup, a movement, a religious order) will face the same processual pattern: spontaneous bonding gives way to rules, roles, and property relations. Understanding this trajectory is not fatalistic -- it reveals the specific mechanisms through which structure re-enters (scaling, property, codification of founding ideals) and the specific leverage points where communitas can be periodically renewed rather than permanently lost.

The pattern applies universally. Turner demonstrates it across the Franciscan order, the Bengali Sahajiya movement, cargo cults, and modern communes. The structural entry points are always the same: property relations must be formalized, authority must be delegated, and founding negations must be codified -- each step pulling the group from existential toward normative communitas and eventually into full structure.

Good Examples

  • Franciscan poverty (Ch. 4): Francis's original band lived in existential communitas -- radical poverty, refusal of money, menial labor, nakedness as a "master symbol of emancipation from structural and economic bondage." Growth forced hierarchy (minister general, provincials, chapters). The organizing successor Elias translated Francis into institutional form: "With Elias, structure, both material and abstract, had begun to replace communitas." The order split into Conventuals (pragmatic adaptation) and Spirituals (radical poverty via usus pauper).
  • The scaling paradox (Ch. 4): Francis was "a supreme spiritual master of small groups: but he was unable to provide the impersonal organization required to maintain a world-wide order." His dream of a "little black hen" too small to cover her brood symbolized communitas's inherent scale limit. Existential communitas requires face-to-face concreteness; administration requires impersonal abstraction.
  • Sahajiya-Franciscan parallel (Ch. 4-5): After Caitanya's death, the movement split into a communitas-maintaining faction (Nityananda: casteless, missionary, bhakti-based) and a structure-accommodating faction (Advaita: Brahmanical, orthodox). This mirrors the Spiritual/Conventual Franciscan divide -- post-founder schism between communitas and structure is a recurrent processual pattern.

Counterpoints

  • Permanent liminality is possible but paradoxical. Some groups (monastic orders, hippie communes) attempt to make liminality a permanent way of life rather than a transitional phase. Yet "property and structure are undisseverably interrelated" -- any persisting social group must formalize its relationship to property, which generates structural differentiation (Ch. 4).
  • The memory of communitas persists as internal critique. Even within fully routinized institutions, the memory of original communitas is kept alive by reformist factions and functions as a counterweight to structural drift (Ch. 4). Routinization is not total erasure.
  • Pseudo-hierarchies can coexist with genuine communitas. Marginal groups adopt elaborate rank systems that are expressive rather than instrumental -- "playing the game of structure" without engaging it in earnest. Communitas can persist beneath performed hierarchy until conditions convert it into genuine political structure (Ch. 5).

Key Quotes

"The spontaneity and immediacy of communitas -- as opposed to the jural-political character of structure -- can seldom be maintained for very long. Communitas itself soon develops a structure, in which free relationships between individuals become converted into norm-governed relationships between social personae." -- Victor Turner, Chapter 4

"Spontaneous communitas has something 'magical' about it. Subjectively there is in it the feeling of endless power. But this power untransformed cannot readily be applied to the organizational details of social existence." -- Victor Turner, Chapter 4

"Wisdom is always to find the appropriate relationship between structure and communitas under the given circumstances of time and place, to accept each modality when it is paramount without rejecting the other, and not to cling to one when its present impetus is spent." -- Victor Turner, Chapter 4

"Structureless communitas can bind and bond people together only momentarily." -- Victor Turner, Chapter 4

Rules of Thumb

  • Expect every communitas-born group to develop structure; the question is not whether but when and how.
  • The scaling paradox is irreducible: face-to-face intensity and organizational reach are antithetical. Buber's "community of communities" (federated small groups) is the best available workaround.
  • When a movement's founding negation (poverty, celibacy, castelessness) becomes a legalistic category, routinization has arrived.
  • Communitas is not a substitute for structure, nor structure for communitas -- each supplies what the other lacks ("one affluent supplying power, the other alluvial fertility").
  • Watch for the organizing successor: the figure who translates the founder's vision into institutional form is the agent of routinization. This is a necessary role, not a betrayal.
  • Millenarian expectations ("instant communitas") defer the need for institution-building by locating crisis in the imminent future. When the apocalypse fails to arrive, rapid structural crystallization follows.
  • Communitas movements characteristically pair behavioral austerity with imaginative extravagance -- "naked unaccommodated man" simplicity alongside "almost febrile, visionary, and prophetic poetry."

Related References