Library
The Strategy and Tactics of Pricing: A Guide to Growing More Profitably · 10 of 13
The Strategy and Tactics of Pricing: A Guide to Growing More Profitably
Entrepreneurship HIGH

Building Strategic Pricing Capability

pricing-capability organizational-change price-waterfall sales-incentives value-masters

Problem This Solves

Most organizations struggle to execute pricing strategy even after designing one. Over 60% of sales and marketing managers are frustrated by their organization's inability to improve pricing over time, and 75%+ are unsure what to do about it. Only 6% of Fortune 500 companies have a dedicated pricing function; only 9% of business schools offer a stand-alone pricing course. The result is a persistent gap between strategy and execution where misaligned incentives, ad hoc discounting, and lack of analytical infrastructure erode profits invisibly.

Key Principle

Building pricing capability requires balanced investment across three interdependent foundations: (1) human talent to develop value-based strategy, (2) organizational structure with defined decision rights, processes, and incentives, and (3) data and analytical tools for timely insights. Overinvesting in one at the expense of others is destructive -- airlines in the 1980s overinvested in yield management tools without strategic alignment, enabling price wars that wiped out cumulative industry profits by 1991.

Core Frameworks

Archetypal Pricing Organizations (2x2 matrix):

  • Value Masters (top 5%): Value-based strategy + strong execution = 1.24x industry profit
  • Value Managers (top 25%): 1.11x industry profit
  • Well Intentioned: Value-based strategy + weak execution = 1.04x industry profit
  • Directionally Challenged: No value-based strategy + weak execution = 0.93x industry profit
  • Runaway Trains: No value-based strategy + strong execution = 0.91x industry profit (worst performers)

Executing the wrong strategy vigorously produces worse outcomes than poorly executing the right one.

Decision Rights Framework (Input -> Make -> Ratify -> Notify):

  • Input: Right to provide information before a decision. Granted broadly (finance, research).
  • Make: Right to decide. Must belong to one person or committee for clear accountability.
  • Ratify: Right to veto. Reserved for senior managers to align with broader priorities.
  • Notify: Right to be informed after the fact. Allocated to those affected downstream.

Profitability Factor ("Kicker") Formula for Sales Compensation: Sales Credit = [Target Price - k(Target Price - Actual Price)] x Units Sold where k = 1 / percentage contribution margin at target price. At 20% margin, k=5: a 15% discount reduces sales credit by 75%, not 15%. This links compensation to profitability without revealing cost data.

Price Waterfall: Shows erosion from gross revenue to pocket margin through negotiable items, invoiced items, revenue reducers, and chargeable items. In one example, gross revenue of 100% eroded to a pocket margin of 22.5%.

Customer Profitability Map (four quadrants by EBIT margin vs. gross revenue):

  • Platinum (high margin, lower revenue): Protect fiercely; understand why they pay a premium.
  • Gold (high margin, high revenue): Retain as priority.
  • Silver (lower margin, lower revenue): Average customers.
  • Lead (low margin, high revenue): "Outlaws" -- raise prices or reduce cost-to-serve. Both outcomes improve profitability.

Good Examples

  • Netflix 2014 price increase: Applied 12.5% increase only to new subscribers, pre-announced a range of "$1 to $2" then came in at the bottom. Result: gained 1.7 million subscribers that quarter, estimated $500M incremental revenue by 2017.
  • Global bank: Broke pricing chaos by instituting weekly contract review meetings and discount qualification criteria after country-level ad hoc discounting created hundreds of untrackable discounts and millions in uninvoiced services.
  • Large distributor: Required documentation before waiving shipping charges, recovering tens of millions to the bottom line.
  • Financial services firm: Individual customer profitability analysis drove corrective actions including automation and claims bulking, yielding a 37% profitability improvement.
  • Post-incentive-alignment behavioral shift: After switching to profit-based compensation, salespeople stopped requesting price exceptions and started demanding better value drivers (faster delivery, product quality, sales tools). One team traded company sedans for vehicles capable of delivering product to urgent-need customers who could be sold at full price.

Bad Examples

  • Netflix 2011 price increase: Raised prices up to 60% and split DVD/streaming. Result: 10,000+ negative blog posts, 1 million subscriber cancellations, loss of more than half of market value within two months.
  • Airlines 1980s: Overinvested in yield management tools without strategic alignment, enabling destructive price wars that by 1991 wiped out cumulative industry profits.
  • Telecom COO: Offered "one-time" discounts under board pressure; exceptions quickly became the norm across the regional sales organization and the pricing strategy was abandoned.
  • High-tech manufacturer: Finance enforced a minimum 64% gross margin policy while sales was compensated on volume. Sales spent hours devising creative workarounds rather than selling profitably.
  • Kodak: Invented the digital camera in 1975; management's reaction was "that's cute but don't tell anyone." Failed to monetize, leading to legendary decline.

Key Quotes

  • "Given the attention we pour into pricing our products, why do the outcomes still seem like a random walk?"
  • "The best strategy in the world is only as good as an organization's ability to make it come to life."
  • "More than 58 percent of managers in our research indicated that their incentive plans likely encourage choices that reduce company profits."
  • "There is no better spokesperson for strategic pricing than someone who has experienced the outcomes first-hand."
  • "Firms that successfully complete the transformation to value-based pricing and build the supporting capabilities are significantly more profitable than their industry peers."
  • "Tracking the frequency with which a company's offers win or lose to the competition is probably the most valuable piece of information that a company can collect. Amazingly, many do not do so."

Rules of Thumb

  • Ask your top five executives to articulate the firm's pricing strategy. Five different answers indicates a maturity problem.
  • Track win-loss ratios against competitors, not just performance vs. plan. Meeting plan while losing share masks a problem; missing plan while holding share may not warrant a price cut.
  • Strategy must dictate systems requirements, not the other way around. Answer the five readiness questions before selecting pricing software.
  • Start with Excel and Tableau for transaction analysis before investing in commercial pricing software.
  • Use demonstration projects as controlled experiments with a control group to overcome attribution skepticism. Give successful pilots maximum organizational exposure.
  • Set the profitability factor (kicker) higher than the mathematical minimum because salespeople tend toward short-term thinking.
  • When price band analysis shows low R-squared (below 0.4), discounting is largely random or unjustified. High R-squared (0.8-1.0) means variation is explained by legitimate factors.
  • Protect Platinum customers -- high-margin customers are often taken for granted until competitors poach them.
  • Raising prices on Lead (unprofitable high-revenue) customers is low-risk: either they pay more or they defect, and both outcomes increase average profitability.
  • Senior leaders must "walk the walk." One-time pricing exceptions quickly become the norm.

Related References