Library
The Courage to Be Disliked · 3 of 12
The Courage to Be Disliked
entrepreneurship CRITICAL

Freedom Is Being Disliked

The Courage to Be Disliked Ichiro Kishimi & Fumitake Koga
freedom being-disliked recognition kant inclination

Key Principle

Freedom, defined philosophically, is the willingness to be disliked. To live by your own principles is to give up the impossible project of being liked by everyone. Because some people will inevitably dislike you when you stop accommodating them, being disliked is the cost you pay to exercise freedom and the proof that you are exercising it. As Kishimi & Koga put it, "Freedom is being disliked by other people" (Third Night). This is not a recommendation to seek dislike or do wrong; the precise instruction is "don't be afraid of being disliked."

Why This Matters

The desire for recognition is the chain that makes a person unfree. If your aim is to be disliked by no one, you must "constantly gauge other people's feelings, while swearing loyalty to all of them" (Third Night) — loyalty to all ten of ten people. That is impossible and dishonest, like a populist politician promising everyone everything: the lies surface, trust collapses, and the result is greater suffering. Living to satisfy others' expectations is entrusting your own life to others. The stakes are therefore total: either you accept being disliked by some and live your life, or you chase universal approval and forfeit it.

Good Examples

  • The rolling stone (Kant on inclination). A stone tumbling downhill obeys gravity and is worn into "a little round ball." Surrendering to the desire for recognition — Kant's "inclination," meaning instinctive, impulsive desire — does the same to a person, and that worn ball "would not be the real I" (Third Night). Real freedom is the opposite motion: "an attitude akin to pushing up one's tumbling self from below" (Third Night). Unlike the stone, a human can climb uphill against inclination.
  • The cost stated plainly. Kishimi & Koga: "There is a cost incurred when one wants to exercise one's freedom. And the cost of freedom in interpersonal relationships is that one is disliked by other people" (Third Night). Given the choice between a life everyone likes and a life some dislike, the Philosopher chooses the latter "without a second thought," to "follow through with my own being" (Third Night).
  • The cards (his violent father). The felt powerlessness — "whether the relationship improves depends on the other person" — dissolves once agency is relocated by the separation of tasks. The Philosopher: "I did not change in order to change my father. ... Even if I change, it is only 'I' who changes" (Third Night). And: "I had done my best to lead my father to water. And in the end, he drank" (Third Night). Reconciliation came through his own resolution, never by controlling his father.

Counterpoints

  • Youth's objection — "freedom is doing whatever I want" (the hedonist charge). Doesn't this make one a hedonist or anarchist? Philosopher's rebuttal: that confuses freedom with surrender to inclination. To live by impulse is to be "a slave to one's desires and impulses," not free — it is the rolling stone, not the climber (Third Night).
  • Youth's strongest objection — reversing cause and effect cannot undo the fact that he WAS hit as a child. Philosopher's rebuttal: the past fact is fixed and is not denied; what is not fixed is the goal that fact now serves (teleology, not aetiology). Relocate agency to the present goal, and the card returns to your own hand.
  • Youth — "this is manipulation; I change to change the other." Philosopher's rebuttal: you change only yourself, never to change the other. Manipulation is both wrong and impossible — you can lead a horse to water but cannot make it drink. The other may change "in tandem with" your change, never "due to" it, and never as the goal (Third Night).
  • The accusation "egocentric/hedonist" is itself a defense. It is a "life-lie": an adult who chose an unfree life calls a freely living youth hedonistic to justify his own unfreedom. The truly free person cheers on another's will to be free.

Argumentative Sequence

  1. Recognition is a lie to oneself. Wanting to be disliked by no one forces constant pandering and false loyalty to all — impossible and dishonest; it entrusts your life to others.
  2. Kant's inclination. Surrendering to instinctive desire (inclination) is the rolling stone worn down by gravity; that ball is "not the real I." Real freedom is resisting it — pushing the tumbling self up from below.
  3. Being disliked as cost AND proof. Living by your own principles guarantees some will dislike you. That dislike is the price of freedom and the evidence that you are exercising it.
  4. The guard rail. "Don't be afraid of being disliked" is NOT "seek to be disliked" or "do wrong." Being disliked is the cost, never the goal.
  5. The cards in your hand. Via separation of tasks, change only yourself; whether the other responds is the other's task — so no defiance, no self-righteousness, no manipulation.

Key Quotes

"It is true that there is no person who wishes to be disliked. ... There is only one answer: it is to constantly gauge other people's feelings, while swearing loyalty to all of them." — Kishimi & Koga, (Third Night)

"Real freedom is an attitude akin to pushing up one's tumbling self from below." — Kishimi & Koga, (Third Night)

"Freedom is being disliked by other people." — Kishimi & Koga, (Third Night)

"There is a cost incurred when one wants to exercise one's freedom. And the cost of freedom in interpersonal relationships is that one is disliked by other people." — Kishimi & Koga, (Third Night)

"I did not change in order to change my father. ... Even if I change, it is only 'I' who changes." — Kishimi & Koga, (Third Night)

Rules of Thumb

  • You cannot be loyal to all ten of ten people; stop trying. Some dislike is the receipt for a life lived as your own.
  • When you feel pulled to do what wins approval, ask: am I climbing, or am I the stone rolling downhill?
  • "Don't be afraid of being disliked" — but never set out to be disliked or to do wrong. Dislike is a cost, not a goal.
  • Change only yourself, never to change another. If you act in order to change them, that is manipulation — wrong and impossible.
  • After acting, leave the other's response as the other's task. No defiance, no self-righteousness, no scorekeeping ("I did all this, so it's strange he doesn't like me").

Related References