Entrepreneurship
The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail
Clayton M. Christensen 1997 11 references
Christensen's disruption theory: why good management causes failure against disruptive technologies, and how to respond structurally.
disruptive-innovation corporate-strategy organizational-design technology-management value-networks competitive-dynamics
Overview
The Core Framework
- Well-managed companies fail because the practices that drive success (listening to customers, investing in high margins, demanding forecasts) systematically screen out disruptive technologies
- Disruptive technologies initially underperform on mainstream metrics but are cheaper, simpler, and more convenient — they enter from below and improve faster than market demands grow
- By the time disruption meets mainstream needs, entrants have insurmountable advantages in cost structure, market knowledge, and design experience
- The failure is structural, not personal — it lives in processes, values, and cost structures, not in incompetent managers
- The prescription is organizational: create separate entities with different customers, cost structures, and values
Quick Lookup
| Situation | Do This | Avoid This |
|---|---|---|
| New technology underperforms but is cheaper/simpler | Investigate as potential disruption | Dismiss because current customers don't want it |
| Your product exceeds what customers need | Watch for disruption from below | Celebrate the performance lead |
| Disruptive opportunity identified | Create independent organization | Run it inside the mainstream business |
| Entering an unknowable market | Use discovery-driven planning; plan for learning | Demand market-size forecasts and business cases |
| Assessing org capability for disruption | Apply RPV framework (processes + values) | Assume hiring the right people is sufficient |
| First market strategy fails | Pivot — conserve resources for iteration | Double down or shut the project |
| Recording record profits while losing low end | Treat as a danger signal | Treat as validation of strategy |
The Key Insight
"The logical, competent decisions of management that are critical to the success of their companies are also the reasons why they lose their positions of leadership." — Clayton M. Christensen, Introduction
References
No references match your search.